
Train for any cycling event with Gym Source exercise equipment
The Post has a series of stories and polls on Capital Bikeshare out today. The first is about CaBi's planned and proposed expansions.
By summertime, the bikes should be rolling through the streets of Rockville and Alexandria as the popular Capital Bikeshare program expands into several outer Washington communities. If grant applications come through, they might also appear in the inner-ring areas of Bethesda, Silver Spring, Takoma Park, Friendship Heights and Forest Glen. The development of White Flint and Wheaton make those neighborhoods likely candidates as well. College Park, with thousands of students looking for cheap transportation, is also a tempting location. Greenbelt is in the mix, as are Frederick, Howard and Prince George’s counties.
The Arlington GOP must be so upset, all four of them.
Shane Farthing of WABA makes the point that you can't just plop bikes down anywhere and expect people to ride. You need to make roads and facilities that are attractive to cyclists.
“I don’t think that other jurisdictions can just assume that that groundwork was unimportant. There needs to be some intensive investment accompanying bike share that will bring things up to a standard [in which] people will feel comfortable biking. It’s all about the comfort and the ease.”
For farther out communities, connecting to Metro and commuter rail is the key
Because a Bikeshare membership is good throughout the region, planners expect that many Bikeshare riders will use a commuting combination that even includes two bike trips.
A second article is about customer thoughts on the system and mostly it sounds like people are satisfied (even if the title doesn't make it sound that way).
Bikeshare members mostly extolled the service, listing many more positives than negatives. Michelle Terry, who used to take the bus to the Metro, said she came to Washington not even considering biking as an option.
The only cons mentioned were that sometimes Spotcycle doesn't work, it used to be hard to get a bike and things that have to do with biking in general.
The poll asks "If Capital Bikeshare moves to your neighborhood, would you use the service to commute?"
Happy Groundhog Day
After being accused of being the reason for the rerouting of the Met Branch Trail, Judy Christensen, Executive Director of Montgomery Preservation, Inc. which manages the historic B&O train station says that it is not them.
MPI welcomed the Metropolitan Trail as a way to showcase the historic B&O Station to trail users. Last spring DOT presented MPI with a trail alignment through our property that far better accommodates our programs, and MPI thought we were all going forth with this design. MPI asked several times to meet and address implementation issues such as the loss of parking, liability and compensation but DOT did not meet with us again.
So then who, Silver Spring Trails asks, is the true culprit?
Good morning
Yes, this is again late...
Is "Lockdown" a remake of "Escape from New York" or just a ripoff? Either way, it's nice to see Maggie Grace working again.
Good afternoon. I once again left the morning linkdump finished on my computer at home. I can assure you it is awesome. Sorry.
From American trails
At 3:00 PM, Tuesday, January 31, House Transportation Committee Chairman John L. Mica (R-FL) and Committee Members will release the "American Energy & Infrastructure Jobs Act" (H.R. 7). According to the Rails to Trails Conservancy, who obtained a copy of the bill, the Recreational Trails Program would be authorized at $85 million for FY 2013-16, but the Safe Routes to School program would be eliminated along with dedicated funding for Transportation Enhancements. Eligibility for preserving abandoned railway corridors, including trail conversion, is specifically eliminated.
Advocates are working with a House member to propose an amendment that would protect funding for TE and other bike/ped programs. We'll let you know more as soon as we hear details.
See more information on the process and background at:
http://www.americantrails.org/reauth.html
American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012
(Summary from Rails to Trails Conservancy, Jan. 30, 2012)
The bill contains changes to two of the three core programs for pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure; one program remains intact:
1) The Recreational Trails program is consistent with the structure under SAFETEA-LU. Funding is established at $85 million for each of fiscal years 2013 – 2016.
2) The Safe Routes to School Program is eliminated in its entirety.
Eliminating the SRtS program means the loss of $180 million per fiscal year for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects to support walking and bicycling as modes of transportation for children to school, as well as the established institutional support of the SRtS coordinators at each state DOT.
3) The Transportation Enhancement activities remain eligible under the Surface Transportation Program, but the 10 percent set-aside of apportioned funds is stricken.
Eliminating dedicated funding for transportation enhancement activities means these projects will have to “compete” for prioritization with all other surface transportation projects in regional and state planning processes. In addition, the following activities which were eligible under SAFETEA-LU are eliminated:
a. Acquisition of scenic or historic easements, including battlefields
b. Historic preservation
c. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation facilities
d. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors
e. Establishment of transportation museums
These five categories combined comprise 24% of all state DOT project programming of TE activities since 1992. Eliminating these activities will significantly restrict the flexibility state DOTs have relied upon in the past to enhance the nation’s surface transportation system. This is especially true for the two most popular activities of these five singled out for elimination, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation facilities (9.4% of all TE activity) and preservation of abandoned railway corridors (7.2%).
Outside of the three core programs, there are two other noticeable provisions of this bill for pedestrian, bicycle and trail interests:
1) Funding for the CMAQ program is moved to the new “Alternative Transportation Account,” which was previously the Mass Transit Account.
2) The ability of state DOTs to use CMAQ or STP apportionments to fund bicycle and pedestrian coordinator positions is stricken.
Eliminating the bicycle and pedestrian coordinator positions represents a huge step backward for state DOTs. It passes more of the burden of administering federal-aid highway programs directly to them.
I believe DC's coordinator is paid for with CMAQ money, but I may be mistaken.
CITATIONS p. 10 line (17): Authorizes $85 million for each of 4 fiscal years for Recreational Trails.
p. 64 line (11) Renames the Mass Transit account the Alternative Transportation Account of the Highway Trust Fund, and puts CMAQ (@ $2 billion per year) under it (p. 11 line (5)).
p. 33 line (1), stricken from the STP:
(1) Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for highways (including Interstate highways) and bridges (including bridges on public roads of all functional classifications), including any such construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate
other transportation modes, and including the seismic retrofit and painting of
and application of calcium magnesium acetate, sodium acetate/formate, or other environmentally acceptable, minimally corrosive anti-icing and de-icing compositions on bridges and approaches thereto and other elevated structures, mitigation of damage to wildlife, habitat, and ecosystems caused by a transportation project funded under this title.
p. 34, line (17): TE remains eligible under the STP. But set-aside is repealed...
(2) For transportation enhancement activities. - In a fiscal year, the greater of 10 percent of the funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(3) for such fiscal year, or the amount set aside under this paragraph with respect to the State for fiscal year 2005, shall only be available for transportation enhancement activities.
p. 174 line (10): Stricken from Sec. 217, Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways:
(d) State Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinators. - Each State receiving an apportionment under sections 104(b)(2) and 104(b)(3) of this title shall use such amount of the apportionment as may be necessary to fund in the State department of transportation a position of bicycle and pedestrian coordinator for promoting and facilitating the increased use of nonmotorized modes of transportation, including developing facilities for the use of pedestrians and bicyclists and public education, promotional, and safety programs for using such facilities.
P. 177: Safe Routes to School Program is repealed in its entirety
The following TE activities are stricken on p. 179 line (10) beginning:
(C) Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites (including historic battlefields). (F) Historic preservation. (G) Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals). (H) Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use of the corridors for pedestrian or bicycle trails).
(L) Establishment of transportation museums.
Banner design by creativecouchdesigns.com

Recent Comments